'Patients have right to refuse students' tests' - University of Malta

Health ministry, University of Malta faculty of medicine and medical students say OPM report 'did not give true picture' of situation in hospital.

The University of Malta has said patients have the right to refuse being tested by medical students and that they cannot be coerced into doing anything against their will, in a reaction to a confidential report of the Office of the Prime Minister in 2009 which catalogues the disregard for patient privacy by medical students.

The report raised serious concerns on how medical students have unrestricted access to patients’ files containing confidential information, even when patients want to keep this information strictly between them and their doctor. The same report also reveals how too much access is given to the medical students at the detriment of the patients’ privacy.

“With the presumption that MDH is a teaching hospital, [it] gives them an automatic right to such information without the patient’s consent,” the report notes. “Even though Mater Dei is a teaching hospital, it does not mean that medical students and other medical professionals – including other hospital staff – have an automatic right to patient data.”

The worrying revelations of the report include instances when consultants were seen “intimidating the patient”, and forcing the patient to give his/her consent to let students to carry out tests. Allegedly, the students warned the patient that s/he might be under their care in future as medical doctors "so you’d better approve consent.”

The health ministry called the “single observations” illustrated in the report as “not representative of the great majority of medical students” and that they did not give a true picture of the situation in 2009, “let alone today”.

The ministry said action was taken to make doubly sure that all ethical duties are effectively communicated to all clinical students. “MDH management does not tolerate any shortcomings by students and if any specific case is brought to the attention of MDH management then all necessary disciplinary and/or corrective measures will be taken as necessary,” it said in a statement.

The University of Malta also said the issues had been raised at a meeting between the Mater Dei CEO and director of information management and the dean of the Faculty of Medicine & Surgery.

“All the issues were addressed and the necessary corrective action was taken. In addition, in July 2010, the medical council subsequently issued a booklet entitled ‘Guidelines for Medical and Dental Students: Professional Values and Fitness to Practice’.”

In another reaction, the Malta Medical Students Association said only students within the last three years of their studies “have access to wards, patients and data”.

“Since the issue of the report, considerate revision of medical education and hospital administration protocols have been enacted,” the MMSA said in a statement.

The MMSA said that amongst the reforms to their privileges, every clinical medical student is to sign a document as agreement to abide by all data protection hospital policy and government legislation.

The report reveals that medical students were seen going in and out of wards wearing no identification tags. The report says patients were misled by the lack of tags, thinking the students were their medical officers.

The MMSA said that students were given identification tags which must be put against a sensor at the ward door in order to gain access to it. “Students are not allowed to take files out of the ward where the patient is residing. Moreover, the medical curriculum goes specifically into patient-professional communication, ethics and behaviour by including numerous sessions throughout the year and five 3-day seminars through the 5-year course.”

The MMSA said these sessions commence as from the first year, to make sure that disregard of psychological and social issues do not occur once qualified.

The students’ association also defended data access, saying this gave students the opportunity to start relating medical findings to the patient’s symptoms and findings from a physical examination.

“One other diagnostic ‘test’ performed by students is supervised blood sampling. Postponing such crucial training to the time when one is a qualified junior doctor will only lead to the doctor not having the necessary skills and attitude required. This process is also guided by the Malta Medical Council under a set of published guidelines for medical students.”

avatar
We pretend sterling service from these future doctors right? Where will they learn? Just ask yourself, what if the things that the student learned today will save a life (maybe more) in the future. What if my particular illness will inspire this student into specializing in any particular field?
avatar
I agree with you Mr Azzopardi. Not only it is unfair on the patient (which is top priority) but the medical students do not benefit at all from such a situation. This is not the norm, however, as the class is divided in groups of 4-5 usually with 1 consultant. This issue, as far as I am concerned, is also being tackled by the medical school, following an influx of students in the 2010/2011 intake. With regards to this report and the other one, I think the point is taken - patient privacy, dignity and desires are to be strictly respected at all times - nothing new to the medical students and the medical professionals. Anything over and above has been tackled by the comments expressed by the readers - which, by enlarge, have rendered both articles virtually invalid.
avatar
A group of 15-17 studends enter a patient room while is examined. Why put the extra anxiety on patients. This is not right at all. If it were one student, it's not so bad, but it should never be a group. This is not acceptable.
avatar
It is clear that the report is an amateurish report and the reporters were naive enough to believe 100% what was merely a fraction percent. It is destructive and the replies should be unequovical for such damaging remarks. The paper had a scoop and now that it is clear that the matter was based on imagination and amplified out of all proportion...a clear statement will be the only solution to repair what can be repaired. It is a shame of any person writing wuch a report full of blatant lies.
avatar
Very well said Mr. Borg. I coudn't agree more. I'd like to thank the UOM and MMSA for clarifying the situation. This 2009 confidential report was a largely unfounded attack on all medical students, filled with assumptions and generalisations, probably fueled by a single incident. It shows a total lack of research and expertise from the person(s) responsible for this report (for example it states that "Specific areas of concern include access to rooms containing patients’ data and files, and claims that whilst staff do not approve of this action, medical students have the run of the hospital premises at all times" - something which as a medical student I can assure you is a blatant lie, probably even as an observer who has been to Mater Dei once in your life you can tell what a silly thing it is to say... do we seriously have the run of the hospital premises at all times??? Unbelievable... In my own humble opinion, I hold a gentle suspicion that the person(s) responsible for this report has/have something against doctors and medical students in general... since it is filled with sweeping statements, generalisations, and totally inaccurate statements aimed to alarm people, but that is my personal opinion. As a medical student, I was deeply offended and couldn't believe what I was reading...
avatar
@ coco the data is not made available to 'all', but it is available to all students who have proven an understanding of the concept of professionalism after a signed agreement between the Hospital Management and the student. Let there be no mistake made, students don't take this for granted and it is indeed a privilege to be allowed to interact with patients. These students aren't frivolous teenagers but adults in their 20's who within less than 3 years will be doctors. While i cannot claim that the system is perfect, the prior depiction of the situation with gross generalization as well as little to substantiate the claim other than a single incident described gives a distorted picture of what is really happening. It is not fun or entertaining to spend everyday roaming around sick people and sharing in their suffering. the misbehavior of a sparse few should not shroud the dedication of countless others.
avatar
@coco - available to all? who is all? medical students? what measures would you do if you were in charge of all this? I agree that patient dignity and respect must be adhered to strictly at all times - as is done in the vast majority of cases.
avatar
Granted the majority of medical students definitely respect this ethical problem, but obviously there are other students who just blatantly do not care for the privacy of patients information. I think this is very serious and this is an offence of the data protection act! Some form of action is immediately required in this regard. It is not fair for patient and sick persons data to be available to all with no restictions at all!