Brussels mulling new VAT for its budget

EU proposes tax on financial transactions and EU-wide sales tax to raise up to 40% of its own revenue.

The draft EU budget for the 2014-2020 period includes controversial proposals for EU 'own resources' that comprises a tax on financial transactions and an EU-wide value-added tax (VAT).

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso has had to respond to early criticism from member states. "This is an extremely serious, credible proposal, and to say 'no' to something which was only adopted two or three hours ago is not serious or credible," he said.

The UK has already called the proposals "unrealistic". Denmark and Sweden were also quick to criticise the plans.

The commission documents also include two options to increase EU 'own resources', controversial in some member states who fear it will curb their control over the EU institutions. A tax on European financial transactions could enable the EU to raise up to 40% of its own revenue by 2020. While Germany and France have backed the move, Britain fears it would cause an exodus of activity from the London's financial heartland unless implemented at a global level.

A second option would see the creation of a EU-wide sales tax. The new VAT would be levied at a fixed percentage by governments and transferred directly to EU coffers. Current member state contributions based on VAT would be abolished.

The Commission also said that it wanted to simplify the rebate system through a new practice of annual lump-sum reductions for Germany, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands. Former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher won an annual adjustment in 1984 to compensate for the fact that Britain paid more into EU coffers than it received. The cheque is currently worth over €3 billion a year.

Wednesday's proposals are only the start of a lengthy negotiation between member states and the European Parliament over the future EU spending plan, with a final agreement expected at some point in 2012.

MEPs have already insisted that they want a five percent increase in the long-term budget, with the incoming Polish EU presidency planning to hold a meeting between all parties late this autumn.

Under the commission blueprint, EU spending would rise to €971.52 billion over the seven-year period, with €1,025 billion pledged in commitments. This compares with €925.5 billion and €975.77 billion under the current period (2007-2013), although there is little change in terms of gross national income (GNI).

The budget for the EU's common agricultural policy (CAP) is set to remain largely the same. The current two-pillar structure of the CAP will be maintained, with €281.8 billion pencilled in for direct payments to EU farmers, and €89.9 billion for rural development projects.

A further €376 billion would go to boosting underdeveloped areas under the commission plans, with co-financing requirements relaxed for countries receiving funding support such as Greece.

avatar
1. I wish I could see a list, showing in simple terms, what Malta received from and paid to the EU since joining. 2. I wish I could see serious efforts being made to cut down the waste and inefficiency that exist in the management of this institutions. I am certain that if they "jissikaw ic-cintorin" they will more than find the additional funds required. 3. Probably the Eu has become one of the finest example of the application of Parkinson's law "Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion" "An official wants to multiply subordinates, not rivals" and (2) "Officials make work for each other." 4. I have met quite a few people who had a free holiday to Brussles, paid for by the EU courtesy of our MEP's. These people, on their return, talk about mussels, free trips to Brugges and Antwerp etc. How many citizens of the EU are sent for free holidays every year? What are the benefits for the taxpayer in financing them. 5 One can go on forever. Having said this I still think the EU is a good idea but they should be the shining example for other national governments to follow.
avatar
One would think that EDWARD FENECH ADAMI should be on the forefront of promoting the benefits of EU membership at present. Not too many years ago, HE would boast about how many Euros, this Maltese nation would receive in EU funds. How it is time for HIM to explain to the Maltese people how many Euros Malta must pay in EU taxes so that Brussels can sort out its financial mess and Malta remains a member of this Union from Hell. Is it a coincidence that the YES campaign main characters Simon Busuttil, Joanna Drake & David Casa have benefitted handsomely at the detriment of the Maltese people? And has anybody noticed that they all have lost their EU inspirations since these financial problems started? If the EU wants to improve their budget deficits, they should first consider cuts to the Parliamentarians salaries and their office expenses and consider establishing one parliamentary building in Brussels rather than waisting millions of euros in moving expenses to hold their sessions between Brussels & Strousburg? Such a waste in tax payers money? While austerity measures are being imposed on the people of Europe, there has not been one suggestions from these incompetent politicians that would reduce their benefits. Let's all hope that EDWARD FENECH ADAMI and his morality that was so evident in the DIVORCE issue would shift gears and remind HIM about his political past and the destructive implementation of his policies that has taken Malta back to colonial times and political submission. PROSIT SUR FENECH ADAMI. MAY GOD IN HIS WISDOM HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL.
avatar
Dawn jonqos jisolhuna, mhux bizzejjed halibna Gonzi u shabu. Kollox bhal ahwa fl-EU barra Grazzi EFA u Gonzi ta' l- ingassa
avatar
So we pay taxes equal to all other Europeans but still get treated as second class citizens by our own government ? How do we adjust for the fact that EU gave PN a free hand on tax issues and what is happening in Malta to the detriment of Maltese is a crime! I refer to what Adam Smith called PREDATION. This describes the system of taxation that is imposed on us. It is not taxation that a democratic government collects for the benefit of its citizens - it is a taxation of an OCCUPATION. The taxation that Nazis would impose on occupied territory. I refer to new taxes which are backdates. I refer to judges making threats to citizens to pay up before they have even heard the case - or it will be worse for them. I refer to the fact that foreigners get to pay 5% tax and Maltese get to pay 35% tax. I refer to the fact that EU money goes to promote businesses which politicians have a direct interest in. Why does PL not speak up about these issues? We are worse off than North Africa - at least they have the intelligence of getting rid of their scum.
avatar
Eh!!!! fejn DAHHALTNA Dr Eddie Fenech Adami qedin sewwa dawn ta UE JARMU u JAHARQU dawn il BILJUNI kollha GHALIHOM u lil POPLI TAGHHOM IRIDU ISSALBUHOM BIT TAXXI U TNAQQIS TA BENEFICJI TAFU TISTHU JEW TAL UE
avatar
Let's leave before those eu dictators skin us alive.