Refugee rights activist rejects NATO's denial of abandoning migrants at sea

NATO has denied a report claiming its military units failed to save dozens of migrants fleeing north Africa by boat which had been adrift in the ocean for 16 days, leading to the deaths of 61 people.

British newspaper The Guardian said despite a distress call from the boat to the Italian coastguard and a military helicopter and NATO warship, no rescue effort was attempted.

It said the boat, carrying 72 people including women, children and political refugees, ran into trouble after leaving Tripoli, the Libyan capital, for the Italian island of Lampedusa on March 25.

By the time the vessel drifted ashore at Zlitan, Libya, on 10 April, all but 11 passengers were dead, and another died after being imprisoned by forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi, the country's leader.

The paper said the migrants used a satellite phone to call Fr Moses Zerai, an Eritrean priest in Rome who runs a refugee rights organisation, who then alerted the Italian coastguard.

Zerai, who was in Malta over the weekend, rejected NATO’s denial, and stood by what the migrants have claimed.

The story is corroborated by another story carried recently by MaltaToday on April 17 when a boat laden with 171 african refugees fleeing Libya and rescued by the Armed Forces of Malta was denied assistance by NATO. One woman died on board and was later buried in Malta.

Witnesses told the paper a military helicopter appeared above the boat and lowered food and water, but flew off without a rescue boat arriving.

A survivor said the boat was later carried towards a Nato aircraft carrier, which the paper concluded was the French ship Charles de Gaulle.

But NATO spokeswoman Carmen Romero said the only aircraft carrier under the alliance's command at that time was the Italian ship Garibaldi.

"Throughout the period in question, the Garibaldi was operating over 100 nautical miles out to sea. Therefore, any claims that a NATO aircraft carrier spotted and then ignored the vessel in distress are wrong," she said.

"NATO vessels are fully aware of their responsibilities with regard to the International Maritime Law regarding Safety of Life at Sea and have already saved hundreds of lives at sea," she added.

Thierry Burkhard, spokesman for the chief of staff of the French armed forces, also denied the French navy had failed to help.

"The Charles de Gaulle was never at any moment in contact with this type of boat, nor [was] any other French vessel, due to its position," he said.

A spokesman for the Italian coastguard said the location of the ship was pinpointed with the help of satellite telephone providers and heading towards Maltese waters.

An alarm was sent from its Rome headquarters to all ships, civilian and military, in the area.

"If we had been in the area, we certainly would have intervened," said Lieutenant Massimo Maccheroni, adding that under maritime law, the coastguard cannot operate in other country's waters without permission.

Zerai told the Guardian the failure to rescue the migrants constituted a crime.

"There was an abdication of responsibility which led to the deaths of over 60 people, including children," he said.

"That constitutes a crime, and that crime cannot go unpunished just because the victims were African migrants and not tourists on a cruise liner."

Dozens of immigrants from north Africa have died attempting to reach Italian shores. On April 6, a boat carrying 200 people sank south of Sicily. In that case, Italian ships answered a distress signal and managed to save 50 people in Maltese waters.

The Guardian said those aboard the drifting boat included 47 Ethiopians, seven Nigerians, seven Eritreans, six Ghanaians and five Sudanese. Twenty were women and two were small children, one of whom was one year old.

avatar
While alot can be said about the fake solidarity shown by Northern Europe to the Southern European countries, its also true that Europe has been, in the past 50 yrs a beacon of democracy and freedom of speech. One can't be said about many (not all) African countries were dictatorships, poverty, ethnic crimes and corruption has been the rule of the day. One must also take notice that NATO is busy fighting a regime who relies heavily on mercenaries many of whom are......African. People who were allowed to join the regime and are guilty of the worse of crimes towards a usually peaceful nation. Its easy for these gentlemen to point the finger towards Europe when the truth is that its not the Europeans who are fleeing Europe but....
avatar
@Haha. Come on, the Asians did it, the South Americans are doing it, why not the Africans? Simply because it is the last virgin frontier where Capital can plunder freely!
avatar
Fed Up agree with you. They should be sent abck to their own countries and helped. However, Africans have been getting BILLIONS of aid every year for God knows how many years and they still want to live on handouts and not work as we and others do. [email protected] either to the eastern part as you suggested or to their own countries. Or else to the oil rich kingdoms and sheikdoms in the middle east.
avatar
The Nato countries are racists like the Maltese? Those who live in superiour orbit above heaven's doors, please comment. I suppose there wan't be a hullaballo because in this case the people that have let people 'drown' were not Maltese. Africans should be given help to stay and prosper at home. The UN should supervise their development, and foreign investment should not be done in collusion with the local corrupt tyrants and to the detriment of the local people. Money laundering for these corrupt African tyrants is never considered as 'dirty' money? Who knows why..... if not the European and American Banks.? Most of the world's resources: land , water , copper , forests, iron, coal,uranium, oil,diamonds, gold, cocoa, coffee, tea,tobacco, bananas and fisheries what have you are in abundance there...and the people have to flee and cross the cruel and dangerous sea to make a decent living? Justice to people should be done to the millions of Africans at home; illegal immigration and human traficking is good for the Multi- nationals; they burn the ground deplete the resources and go home leaving the Africans to pick up the bill. Please, all 'good doers' give a me break: Justice not charity!
avatar
duncan abela
How can one expect the military forces off the Libyan coast to help. They all have their arms full (no pun intended) offering humanitarian aid based on their particular interpretation of resolution 1730 and consisting mainly of bombing Libya and its infrastructure out of existence. As I have been saying all along true humanitarian aid should be based on: (i) intercepting and not allowing perilous , reckless and often deadly adventures on totally unseaworthy boats to the European shores where certainly these desperate persons are not finding a warm welcome. (ii) Organise protection and evacuation missions using seaworthy craft to safe haven camps in the eastern side of Libya whilst providing such destitute victims of the civil war with decent subsistence allowances.